Equally American Blog

  • Biden Calls Out His Own DOJ’s Defense of Discrimination in U.S. Territories as “Inconsistent With My Administration’s Policies And Values”

    President Joe Biden released a statement today that federal law denying Supplemental Security Income (SSI) benefits to residents of the Territories based solely on where they happen to live is “is inconsistent with my Administration’s policies and values.” Calling on Congress to provide “legislative fixes” for SSI, Medicaid funding, and Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, Biden said “there can be no second-class citizens in the United States of America.” This comes in advance of the U.S. Department of Justice filing a brief before the U.S. Supreme Court in United States v. Vaello Madero that will continue to defend continued discrimination against residents of U.S. territories in federal programs.

  • Biden Nominates Judge Gelpí To First Circuit Amid Historic Insular Cases Hearing

    In the hours leading to an historic congressional hearing today on the Insular Cases, President Biden nominated Chief Judge Gustavo A. Gelpí Jr., - an outspoken critic of the Insular Cases - to fill the vacancy on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit left by Judge Juan Torruella’s passing last year. Judge Torruella was himself perhaps the most vocal opponent of what he labeled as the “separate and unequal” doctrine established by the Insular Cases, so this nomination was fitting. Judge Gelpí is the author of the book The Constitutional Evolution of Puerto Rico and Other U.S. Territories (1898-Present), and wrote in a 2011 article: “[The] undemocratic predicament within a federalist government is but the historical outcome of the Insular Cases a doctrine of pure judicial invention, with absolutely no basis in the Constitution and one that is contrary to all judicial precedent and territorial practice.”  


    This Wednesday Congress will hold an historic, first-ever congressional hearing focused exclusively on the Insular Cases, a series of Supreme Court cases grounded in racial discrimination that established a doctrine of "separate and unequal" for residents of U.S. territories.  The hearing will start at 1 p.m. EDT, with the House Natural Resources Committee considering House Resolution 279, which seeks to condemn the Insular Cases as both contrary to the Constitution and for their racist underpinnings.  Equally American's President, Neil Weare, is among the witnesses who have been invited to testify.

  • Guam Legislature Holds Historic Hearing Condemning The Insular Cases

    This week the Guam Legislature held an historic public hearing in support of a House Resolution 279 condemning the Insular Cases, a series of Plessy-era Supreme Court decisions rooted in racial animus that established an unprecedented colonial framework for inhabitants of Guam and other U.S. territories. The hearing brought together an impressive array of current and former elected officials, national and international legal experts, and community activists for a wide-ranging conversation on the importance of finally turning the page on the Insular Cases as a way to help bring an end to Guam’s colonial status. The hearing focused on the Guam Legislature’s Resolution 56-36, introduced by Guam’s Vice Speaker Tina Muña Barnes and a bipartisan group of five other Senators. 

  • White House Names Gretchen Sierra Zorita Point Person for U.S. Territories

    Equally American Thanks Ms. Sierra Zorita for Her Board Services

  • Equally American: Discontinue Relying on Insular Cases

    Congressman Raúl Grijalva (D-Arizona), the Chair of the House Natural Resources Committee, has introduced a resolution (H.Res. 279) acknowledging that the United States Supreme Court’s decisions in the Insular Cases and the “territorial incorporation doctrine” are contrary to the text and history of the United States Constitution, rest on racial views and stereotypes from the era of Plessy v. Ferguson that have long been rejected, are contrary to our Nation’s most basic constitutional and democratic principles, and should be rejected as having no place in United States constitutional law.

← Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9    18  19  Next →